Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Marine Litter in the Russian Gulf of Finland and South-East Baltic: Application of Different Methods of Beach Sand Sampling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part I

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 111))

Abstract

The chapter combines an overview of several studies of marine litter distribution on beaches and in sediments for two Russian parts of the Baltic Sea: the Gulf of Finland and the South-East Baltic for a period of 2016–2020. Various methods for sand sampling on beaches have been applied, including the OSPAR method, NOAA methodology, and IOW beach litter sampling methods (Frame and Sand Rake methods). The results of field research for the period of 2016–2020 showed both the applicability and some limitations of some methods. Results showed an overall high level of contamination with marine litter and its polymer components, microplastics in particular, of the Russian Baltic beaches – both regularly cleaned and “wild” isolated beaches. However, in comparison to the Neva Bay and beaches around the world the beaches of the South-East Baltic are quite clean and there is no obvious difference in the contamination of beaches with high (near resort cities) and low (less-visited coastal areas) anthropogenic load. The largest amount of litter of all fractions was found on the beaches of the inner part of the estuary in the Neva Bay. At the same type a high variability of types of litter was shown: the predominant type of litter in the South-East Baltic is foamed plastic (foam/polystyrene foam), together with paraffin, coming from the tank waters from ships, and a specific pollutant-geosynthetic materials that are a new contaminant emerging from coastal engineering protection activities. In the Gulf of Finland region, the most common litter items are plastic pellets, broken glass, cigarette butts, rusty metal, and pieces of building plaster, together with synthetic napkins and cotton bud sticks, that are not retained by the wastewater treatment facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. OSPAR Commission (2007) Monitoring of marine litter on beaches in the OSPAR region. OSPAR Pilot Project on Monitoring Marine Beach Litter Report. 75 p

    Google Scholar 

  2. OSPAR Commission (2010) Guideline for monitoring marine litter on the beaches in the OSPAR maritime area. https://www.ospar.org/ospar-data/10-02e_beachlitter%20guideline_english%20only.pdf

  3. Moore CJ (2008) Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environ Res 108:131–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. MARLIN (2013) Final report of Baltic marine litter project MARLIN – litter monitoring and raising awareness. http://projects.centralbaltic.eu/project/447-marlin

  5. Cheshire AC, Adler E, Barbière J, Cohen Y, Evans S, Jarayabhand S, Jeftic L, Jung RT, Kinsey S, Kusui ET, Lavine I, Manyara P, Oosterbaan L, Pereira MA, Sheavly S, Tkalin A, Varadarajan S, Wenneker B. Westphalen G (2009) UNEP/IOC guidelines on survey and monitoring of marine litter. UNEP regional seas reports and studies no. 186, IOC Technical Series No. 83, 120 p

    Google Scholar 

  6. HELCOM (2009) Marine litter in the Baltic Sea region: assessment and priorities for response. Baltic marine environment protection commission. Helsinki, Finland, 20 p

    Google Scholar 

  7. HELCOM (2008) HELCOM recommendation 29/2. Marine litter within the Baltic Sea region. http://www.helcom.fi/Recommendations/en_GB/rec29_2/

  8. Haseler M, Schernewski G, Balciunas A et al (2018) Monitoring methods for large micro- and meso-litter and applications at Baltic beaches. J Coast Conserv 22:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schernewski G, Balciunas A, Gräwe D et al (2018) Beach macro-litter monitoring on southern Baltic beaches: results, experiences and recommendations. J Coast Conserv 22:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The Gulf of Finland Assessment. In: Raateoja M, Setala O (eds) Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute 27/2016. Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE). 368 p. ISBN 978-952-11-4578-0 (PDF)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Administration of the Federal State Statistics Service for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region (Petrostat) http://petrostat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/petrostat/ru/statistics/Leningradskaya_area/population/. Retrieved on 24 Jan 2019

  12. Eremina T, Ershova A, Martin G, Shilin M (2018) Marine litter monitoring: review for the Gulf of Finland coast. IEEE/OES Baltic international symposium (BALTIC), 8 p. https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2018.8634860

  13. Eremina T, Ershova A, Shilin M (2018) Marine litter monitoring in the Neva Bay (Baltic Sea): first results. MICRO 2018 fate and impact of microplastics: knowledge, actions and solutions. Сonference proceedings. 19–23 Nov 2018, Lanzarote, Spain. pp 48–49, ISBN 978-84-09-06477-9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haseler M, Balciunas A, Hauk R, Sabaliauskaite V, Chubarenko I, Ershova A, Schernewski G (2020) Marine litter pollution in Baltic Sea beaches – application of the Sand Rake method. Front Environ Sci 8:599978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.599978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Petov NA (2008) Assessment of polymer wastes generation in Russia and ways of their processing. Polymernyematerialy 4:4–7. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petrov OV, Spiridonov VF (eds) (2010) Atlas of geological and environmental-geological maps of the Russian sector of the Baltic Sea. VSEGEI, St. Petersburg. 78 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martyanov SD, Ryabchenko VA, Ershova AA, Eremina TR, Martin G (2019) On the assessment of microplastic distribution in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Fundam Appl Hydrophys 3:32–41. https://doi.org/10.7868/S207366731904004X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chubarenko IP, Esiukova EE, Bagaev AV, Bagaeva MA, Grave AN (2018) Three-dimensional distribution of anthropogenic microparticles in the body of sandy beaches. Sci Total Environ 628–629:1340–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chubarenko I, Esiukova E, Khatmullina L, Lobchuk O, Grave A, Kileso K, Haseler M (2020) From macro to micro, from patchy to uniform: analyzing plastic contamination along and across a sandy tide-less coast. Mar Pollut Bull 156:111198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Esiukova E, Khatmullina L, Lobchuk O, Grave A, Kileso A, Haseler M, Zyubin A, Chubarenko I (2020) From macro to micro: dataset on plastic contamination along and across a sandy tide-less coast (the Curonian Spit, the Baltic Sea). Data Brief 30:105635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pupienis D, Buynevich I, Ryabchuk D, Jarmalavicius D, Zilinskas G, Fedorovic J, Kovaleva O, Sergeev A, Cichon-Pupienis A (2017) Spatial patterns in heavy-mineral concentrations along the Curonian Spit coast, southeastern Baltic Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 195(2017):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.08.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Esiukova E (2017) Plastic contamination on the Baltic beaches of Kaliningrad region. Russia Mar Pollut Bull 114(2):1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zobkov M, Esiukova E (2017) MPs in Baltic bottom sediments: quantification procedures and first results. Mar Pollut Bull 114(2):724–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chubarenko I, Stepanova N (2017) MPs in sea coastal zone: lessons learned from the Baltic amber. Environ Pollut 224:243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Masura J, Baker J, Foster G, Courtney A (2015) Laboratory methods for the analysis of MPs in the marine environment: recommendations for quantifying synthetic particles in waters and sediments. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-48. 31 p

    Google Scholar 

  26. Norén F (2007) Small plastic particles in coastal Swedish waters. KIMO Rep:1–11. http://www.n-research.se/pdf/Small%20plastic%20particles%20in%20Swedish%20West%20Coast%20Waters.pdf

  27. Esiukova EE, Chubarenko BV, Burnashov EM (2018) Geosynthetic materials as a source of contamination of the marine environment by plastic litter. Reg Ecol 3(53):15–28. https://doi.org/10.30694/1026-5600-2018-3-15-28. (in Russian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Esiukova E, Chubarenko B, Simon F-G (2018b) Litter of geosynthetic materials on the shore of South-Eastern Baltic (Kaliningrad Oblast, Russian Federation). 2018 IEEE/OES Baltic international symposium (BALTIC), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2018.8634842

  29. Zobkov MB, Esiukova EE, Zyubin AY, Samusev IG (2019) Microplastic content variation in water column: the observations with novel sampling tool in stratified Baltic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 138:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Esiukova EE, Chubarenko BV, Chubarenko IP, Kileso AV, Zhelezova EV, Grave AV, Tsukanova ES, Sobaeva DA, Tanurkov AG, Yushmanova AV, Turko NA (2018с) Method of selection and accounting of fragments of geosynthetic materials and its testing at the beaches of the South-Eastern Baltic. In: Rumyantseva EA (ed) Arctic shores: the path to sustainability: proceedings of the conference. MAGU, Murmansk, pp 76–79 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Esiukova EE, Chubarenko BV (2019) Geothyntetic litter – new pollutant as a result of coastal protection. Abstracts of XX international environmental forum “Baltic Sea Day”, March 21–22, St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg: “SvoyeIzdatelstvo” LLC. pp 80–82. http://helcom.ru/baltic_sea_day/bsd_thesis_collection

  32. UEG (2014) Contamination of the north and Baltic seas with paraffin. Independent environmental group of experts “Consequences of Contamination Incidents” (UEG) – opinion dated 22 July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  33. GESAMP (2007) “Estimates of oil entering the marine environment from sea–based activities”. (IMO/FAO/UNESCO–IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP joint Group of Experts on the scientific aspects of marine environmental protection). Rep Stud GESAMP 75. 96 p

    Google Scholar 

  34. Qiu Q, Tan Z, Wang J, Peng J, Li M, Zhan Z (2016) Extraction, enumeration and identification methods for monitoring MPs in the environment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 176:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.04.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bagaev A, Mizyuk A, Khatmullina L, Isachenko I, Chubarenko I (2017) Anthropogenic fibres in the Baltic Sea water column: field data, laboratory and numerical testing of their motion. Sci Total Environ 599–600:560–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lusher AL, Welden NA, Sobral P, Cole M (2017) Sampling, isolating and identifying MPs ingested by fish and invertebrates. Anal Methods 9:1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay02415g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cózar A, Echevarría F, González-Gordillo JI, Irigoien X, Úbeda B, Hernández-León S, Palmae ÁT, Navarrof S, García-de-Lomasa J, Ruizg A, Fernández-de-Puellesh ML, Duarte CM (2014) Plastic litter in the open ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(28):10239–10244. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314705111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Russian State Hydrometeorological University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Alexandra A. Ershova & Tatjana R. Eremina

  2. P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Atlantic Branch, Kaliningrad, Russia

    Irina P. Chubarenko & Elena E. Esiukova

Authors
  1. Alexandra A. Ershova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tatjana R. Eremina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Irina P. Chubarenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elena E. Esiukova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra A. Ershova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. German Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Germany

    Friederike Stock

  2. German Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Germany

    Georg Reifferscheid

  3. German Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Germany

    Nicole Brennholt

  4. P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    Evgeniia Kostianaia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ershova, A.A., Eremina, T.R., Chubarenko, I.P., Esiukova, E.E. (2021). Marine Litter in the Russian Gulf of Finland and South-East Baltic: Application of Different Methods of Beach Sand Sampling. In: Stock, F., Reifferscheid, G., Brennholt, N., Kostianaia, E. (eds) Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part I. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_746

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation